Dooce


I removed a blog from the rolls at the request of an anonymous poster who didn’t get the whole “journey thing” that bloggers in her opinion fall back on to explain away their sometimes too distorted by self-perception posts about the events and people in their lives. The commenter arrived here via my post about Dooce, a blogger who makes her living “exploiting” her life and the people in it. Or at least I think that is how my unknown commenter saw it. From his/her comment, I got the feeling that he/she had an up close and personal introduction to reality blogs via a relative. And not a pleasant one. For this reason, my own extended family has not been introduced to my blog. Although I don’t think they would find it objectionable, I am pretty sure there are things about me that they would rather remain in blissful ignorance about and that would suit me as well. However, my husband reads my blog. My friends – from real life – have all been introduced to it. My stepdaughters know about it and at least one of them has read it on occasion.

 

The objectionable blog was Mommy Needs Coffee. I found it on the roll of another blogger from my widow rolls, I think. I didn’t do much more than scan the front-page and she seemed to be just a mommy blogger. The commenter objected to a t-shirt the blogger was wearing that stated if you wronged her, she would blog about the transgression and the transgressor. I think that was probably meant tongue in cheek, but since I have experienced some personal attacks via other web venues, I can see where the commenter might find that upsetting. Especially if he or she had a bad experience at the hands of a family member. I told this person I would remove the link and I did. Afterwards, I went back a read a bit of the blog. I didn’t find it objectionable or mean-spirited. It was written for comedic affect certainly but that was about the extent of it. Oh, and yes it was a blog gone big time. I have linked it here in this post in case anyone wants to check it out but I won’t add it back to the roll. However, I won’t be taking any more blogs from the roll nor will I answer posts about any blogs I have posted or might link in the future. If someone finds any of my links not to their taste, they shouldn’t bookmark that site and if they choose to unlink me – that’s okay too. As a former English teacher, I don’t think much of censoring for any reason. It smacks of holier-than-thou high handedness and it never leads anywhere good. As the saying goes “If you close your eyes, the sun don’t quit shining for anyone but you.”


Rob discovered another blogger for me to add to my blogroll for you – my sporadic audience – because I don’t maintain the blogroll for me people. I surf blogs when Rob clues me to new ones that are interesting or funny or really out there in the zone of WTF and then if they seem worth the effort, I link them. But I seldom go back unless I have some sort of personal connection and even that won’t hold me if the blogger is one of those who only writes when they have something to say. The point of blogging is to say something regularly. Even if it is dumb and poorly written (okay, I don’t mean the last part really – try to be well-written). The blogger is a woman who makes a real living blogging and is now inches away from being a published author. Her name is Heather and the blog is called Dooce. If you think of me as being embarrassingly TMI, then you will be truly appalled by her. Personally, I am in awe of such fearless writing and self-exposure. You can’t be a blogger of note and not be willing and able to do this, which is why I am not a blogger of note. That and the fact that I don’t think I am as left of center as she is. Again, total awe of people who can live their lives in such a manner, but my Chinese astrological sign rules me in regards to such things. It will simply not allow my Greek nature to get out of control. Water rabbits absolutely trump Archers every day of the week. Besides even when my life was most like a soap opera, I was still more “normal” by white people suburban standards than Heather seems to have been. But go and read about her for yourself.

 

The post I have linked to is about her publishing – of which I am in envy and her analogy for her marriage. I don’t know that I have given my marriage enough thought as of yet to find some cultural analogy that epitomizes it. I am pretty sure that it would not be an MTV reality show about a too rich kid and his bodyguard, but that is just how I don’t roll. Though I often compare myself to Scarlet O’Hara the truth is that while I can completely empathize with her exasperation at the silly morays of society when it comes to women’s behaviour in particular and I get her abhorrence of those who would rather wallow than help themselves, I am not as swallow or blinkered about myself. Her lack of depth is the whim of her creator. Margaret Mitchell cleverly made Scarlet the persona of the Southerner of her times. But for me it is her feelings of imprisonment and constraint that ring most true. Rhett is my Rob and when I told him this he was a bit surprised “Why? He walks out on her in the end.” Which is true but not what I see in the character that reminds me of my husband. Rhett is the realist. He is amused by Scarlet’s impatience and her lack of understanding that while society can have all the rules it likes when it comes to personal choices and behaviors, the bottom line is that they are personal. We are in control of ourselves – reactions and decisions. We can’t be caged without our consent. Furthermore, it is pointless to rant about things we can’t control. There is do or do not. Accept or decline. In the end we sleep with ourselves and the ones we love most and best. My Rob has is moments but for the most part he is not worried about what others think or about societal rules that exist for the many and are indifferent to the few. He is unflappable and has an acerbic take on much of passes for civilization. Not that I think that one literary couple can serve as an analogy for a real flesh and bones relationship. There are too many aspects of a person and that multiples when you join with another. The ways we complement each other. Our love. Our lust. Our friendship. I don’t even know where to begin. How to find tangibles that could explain “us” to us let alone to people who know us only through me and my writing.

 

Rob and I were talking about the puzzle that is marriage as we walked earlier this evening. How some people grow and learn the give and take and others just don’t seem to get it. It can’t just be love. Can it? There has to be more to the fact that some people can see to the heart of who they are individually and as a team while it escapes so many of the rest. Maybe it is as easy as being able to see yourself and your mate in the antics of a TV characters or the lovers in the pages of a novel written before either of you was born.