Someone asked me that tonight on Twitter. It’s a fair question if you don’t know me because, while I have a fairly consistent set of core values, I am not easily categorized in everyday terms.
I think he was annoyed that, despite my following Green people and sometimes tweeting green causes and issues, I am not green enough to not question things that don’t make sense or don’t match up.
But I am not any more liberal than I am conservative. I am not green because of my pragmatism or a socialist because I was raised by Depression Era parents. I subscribe to no particular worldview because there is validity to be found everywhere – if you keep an open mind and you can’t do that when you’ve picked a side. I learned that in Catholic school.
Yeah, I know.
I don’t believe in a god or gods, but I don’t discount the probable reality of a purpose driven universe and the immortality of that some of us call a “soul”.
I think religions have done more harm than good but don’t think people who practice a creed are necessarily bad or deluded.
I am a progressive though I don’t belong to the cult of “progress”. Science fiction will not save us.
And I do believe in being accountable; earning your own way as much as possible is good for you and that a lot more issues than people realize are nothing more than distractions to keep us from paying attention to what is really important.
The economy, for example, is a distraction. Or at least all the hyperbolic rhetoric and mock warfare and shell-game math that gets tossed at us by the main stream (and off the beaten path) media, politicians and activists.
Justin Trudeau (infamously and to his likely dismay now) once said that “the economy/budget will take care of itself” or something close to it.
His opponents far and wide mocked and continue to mock such “naiveté”, but he is really not that wrong.
Budgeting has to be done. By everyone. Households, businesses and governments. But it is a lot less quantum physics than you think.
And for the most part that which is the free market – from which economies and government budgets are birthed – does take care of itself as it is largely outside the influence of even those who try to influence or manipulate it.
It grows, contracts and collapses and staggers back to its feet again. Driven a tiny bit by us but it’s mainly dependent on the fact that humans have needs and those needs are met via consumption.
We consume therefore we must work and have a system for bartering.
It’s kind of simple.
Even if everything imploded tomorrow morning with the bell on Wall Street (as likely a place as any), we’d still need things. We’d still have skills to ply. The economy would just flex to accommodate the new reality.
Whatever. Most talk of the jabbering about the economy and budgets is nonsense. Political parties can’t grow economies anymore than they can save jobs that are naturally migrating to newer, cheaper emerging countries. Politicians are impotent forces in terms of doing much good on a large-scale. They can (and have) managed to muck up a lot of things though. Leafing through any history book can tell you that.
But they’ve done great things, you will argue.
I will grant you that, but mostly by accident or as a by-product of something that was probably self-serving and turned out better than anyone could have dreamed.
So do I know who I am?
Do you know who you are?
You’ll give me a list of things you believe in. Groups you belong to. Things and people you love. Tell me about your causes – passionately, I am sure. Assure me that you aren’t a whole host of things.
The way you dress, wear your hair, your markings and piercings, taste in music, food, books and movies/tv will all scream something that probably isn’t you at all.
And in the end, you still won’t come close to telling me anything about the real you.
People’s natures can only be known through real time experiences. Whether that’s via intense conversation or adventures or just hanging out (and yes, it can be virtual).
But getting to know someone is intentional and time consuming.
Unlike my Twitter or Facebook feed, or even this blog.
If who we really are was so easily divined, people would get along better and the world wouldn’t teeter on so many brinks and we wouldn’t be worrying about economies or climate change to the extent that many of us are at actual or virtual war with so many others.
I just finished Justin Trudeau’s “memoir*” and the only thing I know for sure is that he held back. I still have no idea who the man really is but he probably isn’t the anti-Christ and Canada will survive him just like it’s surviving Harper or would survive Mulcair or May.
Look, just because I find this or that news article worthy of sharing or commenting on and just because in your eyes my thought pattern seems contradictory doesn’t mean I don’t know what I am doing or where I would like to go or have forgotten where I have been.
That which is me has survived more ups, downs, and twisty turns than you know or I could ever blog about.
My favorite Father of Confederation is Thomas D’arcy McGee.
He was born in Ireland. A gifted writer and a silver-tongued little devil who began his career at the tender age of barely 18 when he left Ireland for the United States to preach to the immigrant masses about freeing their homeland from British occupation.
He was an activist who eventually became a full-fledged terrorist and wound up in Canada solely because he needed a job and couldn’t go home to Ireland where an arrest warrant and deportation to Australia awaited him.
He ran the gamut from near apostasy to fundamentalist Catholic.
He was an alcoholic and a born again teetotaler.
An Anglo – Quebecker, he worked with McDonald to birth a united Canada and ended his life dreaming of a multicultural society of Canadians.
He died at the hands of a terrorist organization he once believed in with all his soul. They killed him because he knew their vision threatened his Canada.
Along the way, he changed his mind and rhetoric and ways so many times that his critics’ most consistent argument against him was that he never seemed to know what it was he stood for.
But he always did. In the moment and going forward, he knew who he was. He was, like everyone else, a work in progress.
His progress lead him on quite a journey. Mostly because he had an open mind (though he lacked the interest in ever admitting he’d changed it or had been wrong about anything ever).
I am not who I was thirty, or even ten, years ago. I won’t be of the same mind always as I go forward.
That which is me is always me, and it’s only for the privileged few to know. But who I am in this life changes as I learn and grow, as it should, and when I am in a growth spurt – as I am – is not the best time to try to pin me down.
I am just rambling, you think.
No. I’m thinking. On paper. If you’d been paying attention, you’d have figured that out about me already.
And you should try that sometime. You might learn something.
*Memoirs should be saved until one is old enough that one no longer worries about the fall out of being frank and having opinions about one’s one life and experiences. Just my opinion, mind you.
i don’t know who i am, but like you, know a few things that i believe. It’s a good start, i suppose. Based on what you believe, i have a better idea of why we’ve found some level of connection… We should start our own political party — the Pragmatics. Either that, or a rock band…
We could probably do more good via a rock band.
Although two French guys here, left their parties to form a new party – of two right now.
We call it the “Jean-Francois” party b/c they share the same first name. They call it something else. I prefer the nickname. I don’t know what they stand for. Quasi-Quebec sovereignists, I think.
People up here start political parties a lot. There is the Cedar Party in B.C. and I think there is another here aside from the Alberta Party, which is disenchanted Liberals (our provincial parties are not strictly aligned with our federal ones). I like the choice and diversity but the fact remains that only two parties are ever really in charge and generally, they suck.