Monthly Archives: July 2007



I wasn’t feeling well the other night. Running a slight temp maybe and achy. It ended up being a restless night with my husband up a few times to fetch an ice pack and ibuprofen for me. From my prospective it felt so nice to be able to be sick and not have to take care of myself. Having someone to rub my back and bring me a glass of water was such a change from years just previous when being ill was not any different from being well in that I was still having to take care of everything. This last spring I had a couple of sinus infections that flattened me a bit, but my daughter still needed to get to school in the morning and be picked up in the afternoon. Laundry didn’t do itself. Nor did the shopping or the house cleaning. And most of all, I didn’t get any of the real rest I needed to recover properly. 

Rob’s perspective though was far different.

He was very quiet all the next day, and we didn’t get much of a chance to talk until the evening as we were hauling furniture to Jordan’s new home in a little boomtown a about 2 hours south of us. But later when we did talk, he told me that my being sick had scared him, and that he couldn’t help but draw parallels between me and his late wife. I knew that anniversaries were coming. It is going on 11 months now, and he has been somewhat quiet about it all. From my own experiences, I knew also that the last weeks and days are etched on every fiber of your being and are more just memories. Your body remembers and reacts to the last days even when you have no conscious  thoughts to prod them. And I wish I could do something other than just listen. I wish I was more physically recovered from my own years of care-taking that a bit of missed sleep or a string of hot, humid days didn’t trigger my allergies or asthma. It makes him uneasy . Like most of us who lost spouses to long term disease, he thinks he should have seen the signs earlier or known enough to avoid the missteps that sometimes happen when you are navigating a healthcare system that sees the disease and not the person and is often more interested in the disease as a puzzle to solve and to learn from for the next time. It is hard to know that your loved one was just a another patient and is now just another statistic. You can’t turn off that need to be one step ahead and to be better this time. Faster. Smarter. In control. But the thing is that you were never in control, and the outcome had already been decided. You did exactly what you were put there to do. 

I don’t know how to reassure him any more than I know how to reassure myself. I have similar worries about him. I don’t know how a person could not. And I marvel at how we have pushed beyond these fears enough to risk losing again when it is still so fresh in our minds. But, life is inherently risky. Even if you never venture beyond confines of your own home, there is risk. You can’t cocoon yourself away from it, and who is the more foolish anyway? Those who stand back from the raging river thinking they are safer than those who take to the rafts to ride it. They forget that rivers can jump their banks and swallow land and lives for miles around them whenever they choose.

Today, we are back to our normal. Katy is dressed in her Tigger costume and watching cartoons. Rob is using an online crossword dictionary to finish yesterday’s puzzle, and I am blogging. There are groceries to get in town and dinner to plan because Farron is driving out for a visit. This is life most of the time, and we need to focus on the living of it more and the worry about the loss of it a bit less. Fortunately, we have a damn long time to do this.



I can’t think of even one Nancy Drew mystery I ever read cover to cover, and I know a tried to read a few as a child. I was an avid reader of The Hardy Boys even before Parker Stevenson and Shaun Cassidy, but I found Nancy (even the TV version) too girly. A funny assessment really because Nancy Drew was the kind of girl I would still like to be, would like my daughter to grow up to be. Not the modern version but the pre-sixties model. She may have worn twin sets and sensible shoes, but she rarely, probably never, doubted herself or asked for advice or let her boyfriend, Ned, get in the way of solving the mystery. She was self-reliant, confident and free from the need to inspect her inner self. And this last bit is a good thing you might be asking yourself right now (especially if you are female). My answer is a resounding YES. The reason being that women today, young and old, are not only encouraged to introspection: they are expected to inspect their inner and outer selves to the point of inertia and find themselves lacking whenever possible.

So what brought this up? A few things. First there was a review in the Edmonton Journal bemoaning the new Nancy Drew movie. Apparently, the mystery solving machine teen has been burdened with self-esteem issues. Next I was browsing the month’s Oprah (because it is great blogging fodder) and discovered that the theme of the month is how to lose your inhibitions and gain confidence in yourself. Finally, I happened across a blog entry written by a woman who, with her children, is visiting her mother for the summer and lamenting the fact that their life long issues still have the power to render her childlike and doubting herself. The combined effect of these things got me thinking about self-esteem and particularly about the self-esteem of the women, and girls, I know. And, of course, it got me thinking about myself. Especially myself of late.

Let me digress a moment, and I swear there is a point to this, someone posted a link to a CNN article on the board this morning about the horrific treatment of widows in India. It has been making the news quite a bit lately because the widow of John Lennon, Yoko One, has taken up their cause and is trying to push some widow amendment or other through the United Nations. A pointless gesture that will amount to lip service, but that is another digression for another day. I was not a bit surprised by the article’s contents but the whole caste system in India and the appalling way women and children are treated there should not surprise anyone with an double X set of chromosomes because women, as Ms. Ono once so aptly put it, are still “the niggers of the world”. Which leads me back to my original line of thought on the whole self-esteem thing. When do women lose their self-esteem? Or did we ever really have any as a gender? Are we raised and then socialized to see ourselves as inadequate and in constant need of outside tweaking and propping by a world that needs to hold us back in our place?

It doesn’t take more than a quick perusal of the magazine rack at the check out of your local grocery to see what is expected of women. There are magazines selling information on every topic the 21st century woman needs to know, and she needs to know a lot. How to stay young and beautiful. How to cook quick nutritious meals when you are short on time because you had to stay late at the office (or are pulling the second shift at Walmart). How to be beautiful, sexy and a vixen in bed even if you are over 40. How to decorate and organize yourself, your home and your life. And if you are not sure what these magazines are getting at, you can always read about those who put these principles to practice in the latest issue of People or US.  Even though most self-confident of our gender are still appraised first by their packaging and then by their contents. What is that?  You object? Aren’t men today beginning to be judged the same way at times?  Aren’t they subtly plied with similar notions in the handful of magazines aimed at them. Well, at times they are, I guess, but how is that progress? Dragging new victims into the quagmire doesn’t make it less of a muddy obstruction.

Once upon a time I was an insecure, overweight teen who thought that all my problems would be solved if I were thin and could wear the same clothes as my thin friends and my thinner sister. Teachers would like me. Boys would like me. I would be popular. But the truth was that my thin friends and sisters were prisoners. They were just as insecure about everything that I was, but they had the added burden of maintaining an exterior that solved no problems for them and may have created new ones. Teachers didn’t like me much because I didn’t buy into their enthusiastic nonsense. I questioned everything they said and did so in that rather pointed, but earnest, manner that irritates like the sound of fingernails on a chalkboard. Boys did like me but I deliberately held them at arms length. And, according to an old dear friend, I could have been popular, but I chose not to be. Something that is more clear to me now than at the time she made the observation about ten or twelve years ago. But was it really a matter of a lack of self-esteem on my part? Was it really me or the round hole the world gave me to inhabit. I wouldn’t say that I never have moments of doubt at this point in my life. My late husband’s illness, years of caregiving and surviving and then being widowed, rattled my foundation at many different points. Instead of stopping me though they had the curious effect of making me more determined to reclaim my confident, carefree self because long ago there was a little girl who really was free of issues and believed that there was nothing she couldn’t do or wasn’t entitled to. I don’t know if I am full circle yet, but I do know I am closer, much closer, to who I am and where I belong than I have been at any other point in my life.

I am hardly the only woman who didn’t come into her own until adulthood and then only after a series of soul battering hard knocks. And I would like to be able to say that most, if not all, women eventually reach an epiphany that allows them to say, “Fuck it” to the world and live their lives without worrying about what “they” think or what “they” might be saying, but, sadly, I know that this is not the case. Why? Do we have Oprah and self-help books to thank for this? Or our mothers who don’t know any better and continue to run that same childhood reel on us whenever we phone or visit them? Is it a society? The warped world view that teaches our little girls to define themselves by the boys who like them,  or 20 year olds that it is nearly past time to begin physical self-preservation. Are we still being victimized as  mature women (I think that  mature is defined as past 30 but since 40 became the new 30 I am no longer sure of that) when we are told that the only way to avoid complete irrelevance is to cryo-freeze ourselves via botoxification. Are we victims when we listen? Where is our self-esteem.

I began teaching in the public school system around the time that it was popular to “teach” self-esteem. There was the completely misguided theory at the time that self-esteem was something that could be given to a child through constant meaningless praise. Any teacher can tell you that children see through shallow praise quite quickly and that it is only through accomplishments and personal success that students gain confidence in themselves and their new skills  and that eventually this translates to other areas of their lives. 

To tell you the absolute truth, I am beginning to suspect that self-esteem is not a real thing at all. Perhaps Dr. Phil made it up when he was still working the Oprah Show. I am sorry that Nancy Drew is its latest victim though. She was a doer who gained confidence through doing what she loved and helping people in the process. She relied on her intelligence and ingenuity. She wasn’t interested in fitting into any pre-cast molds. Poor Nancy. There is a lesson there, but probably not the one that the filmmakers intended.  


I was watching Rob and Katy interacting at supper last night. We were out to eat, and Katy always sits next to Rob when we dine out now. Not because she has asked to however. Initially it was a strategic maneuver for behavior reasons. She just behaves better sitting next to him than she does next to me, but now she clearly enjoys sitting next to him. He helps her go through the kids’ menu and they color together. Last night she was telling him about a game she learned at kinder-camp this week. She loves it. It is called “What Time is it Mr. Fish”.  Rob remembered the game from his childhood but told her it was called “Mr. Wolf” instead, and when the time came in the course of the game to ask Mr. Wolf what time it was, he would turn suddenly and growl, “Dinner time!” My dear husband delivered the line in a deep growly voice and it startled Katy into a fit of giggles. She is at that age where scary is scary and an adrenaline rush of giggly fun at the same time. Of course she wanted to hear it again, and Rob obliged for quite a while with her giggling and clinging to his arm and begging, “Again, again.” For good measure he would throw in a growl and a snarl here and there, and it was just a pleasure to watch her have so much fun and being such a normal little girl being teased by her “daddy”.

She expects Rob to give her kisses and cuddles after I have tucked her in for the night. She likes to open the front door for him when he gets home from work in the evening and comes to give him a kiss and a hug before he leaves for work in the morning. On mornings she has slept in and misses him, she is visibly disappointed. She refers to him as “daddy” and has even addressed him that way on a few occasions already. But she has not forgotten her own father.

Will’s old recliner is in the living room, and she told me the other day that it has to stay there or he (Will) would be upset. Whenever she watches The Land Before Time, there are tears and calls for her dad (so we have stricken that particular film from the viewing list. Seriously, are kids’ cartoon-makers sadists?) And, she is frighteningly realistic in her views of mortality where fathers are concerned too. A couple of weeks ago Rob was working on his old white van, trying to get it running again because we needed two working vehicles, and she wanted to be outside watching, but since he had the van jacked up he told her it wasn’t safe. I was occasionally checking outside to make sure that he was okay and Katy noticed. I told her that I just didn’t want anything to happen to Rob, so that was why I was keeping an eye out and she replied,

“Yes because then we would have to get him a stone too and look for a third daddy.”

Cold-blooded? Perhaps, but children are mercilessly practical. When I told Rob about the conversation, he joked, “Well, now I know where I rate.” But he is as aware of the fragile nature of life and the people in our lives as I am and as, unfortunately, Katy is too.

It is interesting and a wonder to watch her change over the past few months and I wonder if it is just her age or an effect of my relationship with Rob and consequently his with her. Would she have been this child for Will too? 

My mother assures me she is a chip off my block though I don’t recall being as sassy or independent minded. Rob finds that amusing and I think, sides with my mom on this one. Still, it is good to see her being a child like other children (sassiness too) and not the somber, silent little one she was not so long ago.